
Ethical Challenges in Open Learning Analytics
Authors: I. Fetahović, E. Mekić, K. Kuk, B. Popović, E. Dolićanin
Keywords: open learning analytics, ethics, artificial intelligence, machine learning, education
Abstract:
Open learning analytics (OLA) is a new research field focusing to create an open platform for integration of heterogeneous learning environments. The central notion in OLA is openness, and it relates to architectures, processes, access, and datasets. Learning analytics (LA) usually employs artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and machine learning (ML) algorithms to provide information and predictions, thus enhancing learning experience. AI-based systems provide many benefits, but their implementation raises ethical concerns due to wide range of possible negative consequences. OLA approach amplifies ethical concerns related to AI-based systems, such as privacy, transparency, bias, fairness, etc. In this paper we discuss a comprehensive list of ethical issues in OLA along with mitigations procedures.
References:
[1] J. BUOLAMWINI, T. GEBRU, Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1–15, 2018.
[2] H. ROBERTS ET AL., The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy and regulation, AI & society, 36, 59–77, 2021.
[3] O. ESKICIOGLU, E. DOLICANIN, A. ISIK, & R. KUCI, Recognition and Detection with Deep Learning Method, Scientific Publications of the State University of Novi Pazar, Series A: Applied Mathematics, Informatics & Mechanics, 13(2), 105-115, 2021.
[4] A. AVDIC, U. MAROVAC, D. JANKOVIC & S. MAROVAC, Automatic Labeling of Diagnosis in Medical Reports in Serbian, Scientific Publications of the State University of Novi Pazar, Series A: Applied Mathematics, Informatics & Mechanics, 14(2), 65-72, 2022.
[5] D. PARASCHAKIS, Towards an ethical recommendation framework,In: 2017 11th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 211–20, Brighton, United Kingdom, 2017.
[6] C.M. GRAY, E. BOLING, Inscribing ethics and values in designs for learning: a problematic, Education Technology Research and Development, 64, 969–1001, 2016.
[7] P. BODDINGTON, Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence, Cham: Springer, 2017.
[8] A. JOBIN, M. IENCA, E. VAYENA, The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines, Nature machine intelligence, 1(9), 389–399, 2019.
[9] C. JERNIGAN, B.F. MISTREE, Gaydar: Facebook friendships expose sexual orientation, First Monday, 14(10), 2009.
[10] J. TAO, T. TAN, Affective computing: A review, Proceedings of the First International Conference: Affective computing and intelligent interaction, ACII 2005, Beijing, China, 981- 995, 2005.
[11] L. MUNN, The uselessness of AI ethics, AI and Ethics, 3(3), 869–877, 2023.
[12] A. BOZKURT, From distance education to open and distance learning: A holistic evaluation of history, definitions, and theories, In: Handbook of Research on Learning in the Age of Transhumanism, 252-273, IGI Global, 2019.
[13] P. LEITNER, M. KHALIL. M. EBNER, Learning Analytics in Higher Education—A Literature Review, In: Pena-Ayala, A. (eds) Learning Analytics: Fundaments, Applications, and ˜ Trends. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 94, Springer, Cham, 2017.
[14] A. MUSLIM, M.A. CHATTI, M. GUESMI, Open Learning Analytics: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Perspectives , In N. Pickwart & S. Liu (Eds.), Artificial intelligence supported educational technologies: Advances in analytics for learning and teaching, 93–114, Springer, 2020.
[15] S. ALEXANDER ET AL., OLA Press Release , Retrieved from http://solaresearch.org/initiatives/ola/ 2014.
[16] M.A. CHATTI, A. MUSLIM, U. SCHROEDER, Toward an Open Learning Analytics Ecosystem, In: Kei Daniel, B. (eds) Big Data and Learning Analytics in Higher Education, Springer, Cham, 2017.
[17] S. SLADE, P. PRINSLOO, Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas, America Behavioral Scientist, 57 (10), 1509–1528, 2013.
[18] B. LEPRI ET AL., Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes, Philosophy and Technology, 31, 611–627, 2018.
[19] M. ANANNY, K. CRAWFORD, Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability, New Media & Society, 20(3), 973- 989, 2018.
[20] H. THIMBLEBY, Explaining code for publication, Journal of Software: Practice and Experience, 33, 975–1001, 2003.
[21] T. GEBRU ET AL., Datasheets for datasets, Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86-92, 2021.
[22] M. BRUNDAGE ET AL., Toward trustworthy AI development: Mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims, ArXiv. /abs/2004.07213, 2020.
[23] H. SHAH, Algorithmic accountability, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 376:20170362.20170362, 2018.
[24] L. FLORIDI, Translating Principles into Practices of Digital Ethics: Five Risks of Being Unethical, Philosophy and Technology, 32, 185–193, 2019.
[25] A. BUHMANN, J. PASMANN, C. FIESELER, Managing algorithmic accountability: balancing reputational concerns, engagement strategies, and the potential of rational discourse, Journal of Business Ethics, 163(2), 265–280, 2020. [26] L. FLORIDI, Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 374:2083.20160112, 2016.
[27] D. DANKS, A.J. LONDON, Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems, In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), 2017.
[28] N.T. LEE, Detecting racial bias in algorithms and machine learning, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(3), 252-260, 2018.
[29] B. GIOVANOLA, S. TIRIBELLI, Beyond bias and discrimination: redefining the AI ethics principle of fairness in healthcare machine-learning algorithms, AI & society, 38, 549–563, 2023. [30] S. BAROCAS, M. HARDT, A. NARAYANAN, Fairness in machine learning, NIPS Tutorial, 2017.
[31] M. VEALE, R. BINNS, Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data, Big Data & Society, 4(2), 2053951717743530, 2017.
[32] S. MILLER, Machine learning, ethics and law, Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, 2019.
[33] B. TARRAN, What can we learn from the Facebook—Cambridge Analytica scandal?, Royal Statistical Society, 2018.
[34] D.J. SOLOVE, & P.M. SCHWARTZ, Information privacy law, Aspen Publishing, 2020.
[35] W. HOLMES, D. BEKTIK, B. WOOLF & L. ROSE, Ethics in AIED: Who cares?, In S. Isotani, E. Millan, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Edu- ´ cation, 11625, 424–425, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2019.
[36] K. PORAYSKA-POMSTA, G. RAJENDRAN, Accountability in human and artificial intelligence decision-making as the basis for diversity and educational inclusion, In J. Knox, Y. Wang, & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive Education: Speculative Futures and Emerging Practices, 39–59, Singapore: Springer, 2019.